You Can Talk About Hopscotch Here; Topic 30 [OFFICIAL]

Yeah it really is clean, simple, and approachable.

Yeah Google’s material design was generally pretty solid, but they’re starting to stray (rhymes with @Liquid) from it with rounded corners in weird places (especially when it’s only two and not four), not to mention the horrid 4-color mail and Google Meet logos. I wish it didn’t change from two years ago, the new gmail logo is still an eyesore to look at. (wait, that was 2020?)

@Liquid probably has more @Liquid’s than @Awesome_E has @Awesome_E’s. That sounds like a comp @Liquid would enjoy hosting and judging, because it’s very unique to the user of @Liquid. I find it interesting that you’ve noticed @Liquid is doing this, and I agree that spending this much time reading @Liquid tags probably isn’t the greatest use of @Liquid’s time. On a less-@Liquid but more serious note though, we should really keep this on topic and not form more posts around the @Liquid tag.

Hiding these tags so they don’t take up too much space [1]


  1. @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid ↩︎

6 Likes

Ahh silly @Liquid . Classic @Liquid really to make all of these jokes about tagging @Liquid for the tagging comp about @Liquid . Will tapping demons have a advertisement for the @Liquid tagging comp or maybe possibly a @Liquid code? I really hope so because I love tagging @Liquid , especially for the auto clicker in tapping demons which will hopefully be easier to get by using the potential code @Liquid for the advertisement about tagging @Liquid .

Which means, we should talk about other things while tagging (@Liquid) and not just make posts just for the sake of tagging @Liquid (again, we don’t want to turn this into spam)

5 Likes

Ok I’ll keep it code related, what everyone’s favorite menu design? :skull::skull: or am I just going insane?

just me….

ok….

Summary

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

Yes. True :slight_smile:

3 Likes

Woah @Liquid this is super fun to watch so many people tagging @Liquid multiple times to get into @Liquid’s leaderboard

If only @Liquid would add me to @Liquid’s leaderboard for tagging @Liquid

I’m actually very excited to see this game when @Liquid releases it
@Liquid how did you come up with the idea for Tapping Angels/Demons? /genq

I play tapper games way too much on hopscotch

I want someone like @Liquid, the amazing coder, to make a Duet Game which is 10x harder than regular

Tagging @Jay

@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid
@Liquid

2 Likes

@Liquid I think you need to tell me what you consider as “Spam” because I thought tagging @Liquid too many times in one post would be spam at the very least, especially since it only tags @Liquid once. Clearly I’m being proved wrong as everyone is tagging @Liquid a gazillion times (hyperbole).

3 Likes

Current TALLY

The @Jay Board
@Bobinny - 2
@StarlightStudios - 50
@Crosbyman64 - 13
@Awesome_E - 28
@The_Wild_Fox - 150 (Please don’t spam tag :wink: )

Spam is just doing this:
@@Jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay @jay
And so on.
4 Likes

Btw , what would you rather play?

0 voters

My answer

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

Yeah it can be pretty fun (especially for @Liquid) but @Liquid and many others would not like to see @Liquid be the cause of a @Liquid-walking scene, I mean, slow mode.

It would be cool to see a remastered version with more things like power ups, if I’m to be honest. [1]

You missed my edit, think I hid it too well


  1. Too many @Liquid tags
    Too many @Liquid tags
    Too many @Liquid tags
    Too many @Liquid tags
    Too many @Liquid tags
    Too many @Liquid tags
    Too many @Liquid tags
    Too many @Liquid tags ↩︎

6 Likes

I did put a helpful label on the drop down folder

I’ll stop tagging you, @Liquid, because I don’t want this to get too spammy

3 Likes

Wait now I’m confused because you just said this

2 Likes

They didn’t bother to count all my tags, so I got like 100 more points than I actually deserve

don’t change it though /j

2 Likes

I’d have to admit, @Liquid, the @Liquid board is looking fantastic. Lots of @Liquid tag points.

Every @Liquid I see is another @Liquid I know. I might as well tag @Liquid for every project I make /j

I don’t know why tagging @Liquid is fun… The one thing I think is more fun than tagging @Liquid is spam-liking @Liquid. No one can stop me from tagging @Liquid… unless @Liquid hides their own bio :eyes: so I wouldn’t be able to tag @Liquid.

4 Likes

Silly @Liquid . How’s your project going?

maybe it would have some really nice menus if I was on the dev team cough cough

My thoughts on @jay

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

@Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid @Liquid

Ok this time for real, let’s keep this completely on topic so that if you were to post here, it would look the same as if this ‘competition’ was not happening. I know it can be fun to compete in the most times someone can tag @Liquid (<< see, legit use), but we’ve already gotten way too carried away. I don’t think this is what @Liquid would have wanted to happen, especially given some of the clarifications that have already been made to the community as a whole in the past few days.

If this does continue, then unfortunately posts and/or the competition will have to be removed. But hey, I get that it can be fun and don’t want to ruin it, so I don’t want that to happen either.

7 Likes

Ok I’ll stop making posts for tagging (can I do it? please one more time…… ahhhhh) @Liquid . I’ll just tag @Liquid like normal.

But can we make one exception of if we would normally say Jay in a post, can we use @Liquid instead so it counts?

Yeah that’s the objective – and that’s what makes it still appear as if the competition didn’t exist

4 Likes

I agree. If it wasn’t for this comp of theirs, I generally would only ever tag Jay whenever absolutely necessary.


Getting Back on Topic,

Anyone coding anything big?

3 Likes

On a scale of 1 to 10, I’d say 9. Unfortunately I can’t say what it’s for, but it’s pretty exciting! (@Liquid would really love something like it, if only I could say what it was lol)

5 Likes