Yeah it really is clean, simple, and approachable.
Yeah Google’s material design was generally pretty solid, but they’re starting to stray (rhymes with @Liquid) from it with rounded corners in weird places (especially when it’s only two and not four), not to mention the horrid 4-color mail and Google Meet logos. I wish it didn’t change from two years ago, the new gmail logo is still an eyesore to look at. (wait, that was 2020?)
@Liquid probably has more @Liquid’s than @Awesome_E has @Awesome_E’s. That sounds like a comp @Liquid would enjoy hosting and judging, because it’s very unique to the user of @Liquid. I find it interesting that you’ve noticed @Liquid is doing this, and I agree that spending this much time reading @Liquid tags probably isn’t the greatest use of @Liquid’s time. On a less-@Liquid but more serious note though, we should really keep this on topic and not form more posts around the @Liquid tag.
Hiding these tags so they don’t take up too much space 
Ahh silly @Liquid . Classic @Liquid really to make all of these jokes about tagging @Liquid for the tagging comp about @Liquid . Will tapping demons have a advertisement for the @Liquid tagging comp or maybe possibly a @Liquid code? I really hope so because I love tagging @Liquid , especially for the auto clicker in tapping demons which will hopefully be easier to get by using the potential code @Liquid for the advertisement about tagging @Liquid .
@Liquid I think you need to tell me what you consider as “Spam” because I thought tagging @Liquid too many times in one post would be spam at the very least, especially since it only tags @Liquid once. Clearly I’m being proved wrong as everyone is tagging @Liquid a gazillion times (hyperbole).
I don’t know why tagging @Liquid is fun… The one thing I think is more fun than tagging @Liquid is spam-liking @Liquid. No one can stop me from tagging @Liquid… unless @Liquid hides their own bio so I wouldn’t be able to tag @Liquid.
Ok this time for real, let’s keep this completely on topic so that if you were to post here, it would look the same as if this ‘competition’ was not happening. I know it can be fun to compete in the most times someone can tag @Liquid (<< see, legit use), but we’ve already gotten way too carried away. I don’t think this is what @Liquid would have wanted to happen, especially given some of the clarifications that have already been made to the community as a whole in the past few days.
If this does continue, then unfortunately posts and/or the competition will have to be removed. But hey, I get that it can be fun and don’t want to ruin it, so I don’t want that to happen either.