it would make flying on tuxing’s back to different planets so much easier.
6 Likes
I will say that being able to breathe in space is very limited to what one’s profession is, but it would potentially open up the idea that you could breathe in any vacuum where there is no air. This in it of itself makes it much easier to supply you with necessary materials to live in harsh regions or other planets as now you don’t need to pack heavy oxygen tanks, just a vacuum of nothing. Let’s say you are going to Mars, wow good luck! Because you don’t need oxygen your space agency has decided not to pack any onto your spacecraft thus making it able to take more weight from other items. Those other items could be personal belongings or important science equipment that they didn’t feel like sending up in it’s own billion dollar ship. One down side to this is that, you can’t really be in space as your body would still have issues that could lead to an untimely end. By no longer needing oxygen you have lengthened your time outside to having hypothermia hit you hard.
Being able to breathe underwater is also really cool and you would be like a fishy. But I’m gonna have to go with space.
5 Likes
I prefer planets to fishes. By a lot
4 Likes
My imaginary character can do both, but being able to breathe in space would be so cool. And if you can travel at the speed of light, you’d be able to travel to more planets than you ever could.
Although being able to breathe underwater would grant you the ability to discover the other 95% of the ocean, traveling through space would be much cooler (even if you have to break the laws of physics to do so).
6 Likes
assuming you dont get crushed by the pressure
6 Likes
Would You Rather
Would you rather:
- Have an iPad
- Or an iPhone
0 voters
-
This has been posted on behalf of users, by Discourse Automation. To submit a WYR, post in Would You Rather Submissions. ↩︎
12 Likes
It would be fun to have an iPhone, because you can bring it almost everywhere you want…
But you can never use the app again to code, you always have to use the web explorer, and it’s very hard to type.
So I’m choosing for an iPad.
6 Likes
wdym?
the app is available for iPhones and you can still code on them.
8 Likes
you can use the app on an iphone.
i prefer ipads because they’re probably the best way to create digital art
6 Likes
iPhones are more portable, but they’re screen is so tiny it’s hard type or play anything on there. so I’m going with an iPad
6 Likes
At first I said iphone, but all new phones are almost the same but Apple still makes the best tablets a million times over lol
6 Likes
i can bring iphone everywhere i want and can put it in my pocket while ipad I cant bring it everywhere and need a really big pocket lol
6 Likes
I have an iPad myself, and it’s so much easier to code on one…
You do know iPhones are Apple devices and not Android devices, right? Hopscotch is available on iPhones and aren’t exclusive to the tablets, lol…
5 Likes
lol, I used to only use HS on iPhone
6 Likes
lol, I used to only use Hopscotch on my watch
Now I also use it on my samsung smart fridge
10 Likes
Personally, I don’t really like Apple products but… an iPad is better for infinite paper and drawing (even though I use my phone for a large majority of my art currently)
5 Likes
I really don’t understand how some people can play Roblox on a screen as big as that, it really stretches my fingers when I try to tap jump.
Also, an iPhone is portable and is probably not going to get stolen :\
5 Likes
So close!
5 Likes
Well, iPhones tend to be a bit more expensive. Plus the iPhone 14 is like the thing everyone wants at the moment, so if you had one it’d probably get stolen /hj
5 Likes
It was fifty fifty yesterday 
6 Likes