2 posts were merged into an existing topic: General Discussion Topic
I’ve been wanting this for the longest time lol
I feel that a significant limitation of Hopscotch is that you cannot reference clone’s traits/variables by index as you would in a more sophisticated language, e.g. Object_Collection(Index).Property
I think this could be accomplished in an unobtrusive way so as to not over complicate things for new Hopscotchers.
I think you should consider adding an additional selection to objects reference menu for object variables:
This would populate the object variable bubble with 2 references, so in the example above it would display
Set Clone Index () of () Vertical velocity to (10)
- The 1st bubble would accept a number or variable
- The 2nd bubble would accept an object reference. Similar menu to the existing Object reference menu except with only explicit object references.
Is this possible within the current architecture?
I totally agree with that, it might be a limitation but I really hope that you can do that, as it would be useful to reference a clone’s position, etc. Imagine how much easier it’d be to make particle trails and everything! (Assuming it would be a normal number / variable field)
That would help so much!
Thank you for this! I’ll check back with the team.
As for the cloud variables, this will be implemented into the roadmap, but I don’t have the timeline yet.
@Ana said this to me in a email. YAY!
We should like, host a party.
this is going to be a game changing block
Yes I can’t wait! Should we tag omtl?
I don’t think so.
It’s only in the roadmap.
Could be years before it’s implemented lol
Ha ha maybe.
I hope it doesn’t take years tho lol
Hopefully like 2 updates or something.
Or even less
Like one, though I doubt it.
I’M SO EXCITED