A feature I’d like to see in Hopscotch is:
A conditional block which gives the opposite of the block inside of it.
I’d use it for this type of project:
Projects where I want to check if something does not match something
Here are some examples of Hopscotch code that could be improved if we had this:
Checking if something doesn’t match something, quicker to make code to point towards something
19 Likes
This would be super useful!
2 Likes
One word: Genius.
But it is Petrichor we’re talking about, so no surprise there.
5 Likes
Nobody
June 7, 2020, 11:09pm
4
I was thinking of that an hour ago lol
then I realized you could do the opposite [eg instead of when x < 500 then x > 500]
but idk if that’d work, I’d like to see this
1 Like
Don’t forget the condition of =
Not > is <=
Not < is >=
6 Likes
I want this! After I started using not conditionals in Python, I have wanted this in Hopscotch!
2 Likes
As per usual petrichor is openly pitching all his hs ideas on the forum where all the other kids coding languages spy… @Scratch , @Tynker . I know u secretly are reading this
2 Likes
Nah, Scratch really isn’t a competitor.
1 Like
I mean, I think it’s based off it to some extent, but hopscotch is on a completely different platform, so
1 Like
Hopscotch definitely copies scratch (jk)
1 Like
This would be very useful right now
9 Likes
Fortunately you can glitch a conditional into a number slot and check if it’s equal to zero, but an actual not block would be good
6 Likes
Yeah. I was trying to do something like that that earlier but I’m not not sure how.
6 Likes
I will not not bump this; it would be very not useless.
3 Likes
Does the implementation of the ‘not’ conditional, in the recent update, satisfy the need you wanted here? If so, I can clive the topic.
3 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 2 days. New replies are no longer allowed.