Self-explanatory, I keep finding a lot of songs that I want to make go up in that octave. Probably won’t happen for awhile, which is fine.
- I agree
- I disagree
0 voters
Also, please don’t say “first post” or argue on my topic :))
6 Likes
Would be beneficial in every way. A lot of hopscotchers create music, GweTV especially.
5 Likes
There’s definitely hope – the sound files are named 48.wav through 84.wav because those are the note indexes (those don’t have the old constraint of “low-” or “high” notes which limit the octaves, which suggests that adding an octave is just a matter of time).
However, I think it should go one octave lower first.
6 Likes
I agree but I would prefer the c1 scale
4 Likes
c1-c10 would be awesome
5 Likes
agree 100%
2 Likes
@Ana, @AwesomeOnion - this would make my day if this was implemented! It seems like there are 15 votes for “yes” on the poll created there, too. :)
6 Likes
It would be SO great if hopscotch let us use the beta editor and new instruments for free, and left pictures and drawing for purchasing.
2 Likes
bruh I think anything more than c-7 is necessary lol
3 Likes
I think 88 notes worth is the most we need. The only limit is the number of sound files.
3 Likes
Although I will say that the advanced editor for music still looks great! I didn’t see it until now. 
The new features are definitely still big for people that want to make music! Thank you for the new additions :)
(I can’t edit my post - ) @Ana @AwesomeOnion
5 Likes
Why only 88 when we can have 128?
6 Likes
I say 88 because that’s how many keys are on a full size keyboard.
3 Likes
Why 128 when we can have 130 (+2)
2 Likes
How about 512, lol?
3 Likes
I agree with this but I’m satisfied with 3 octaves right now lol
4 Likes
I never seem to use more than 3 octaves, but when there comes a time, I’ll probably need more than that.
1 Like
How about every note that can be registered by human ears (and then a dog whistle?)
3 Likes