This isn’t like google docs. This would be a different system. Google docs, anyone with edit permissions can submit without confirmation. Basically, read only, edit with confirmation, and edit fully.
1 Like
edit with confirmation = can comment on docs. (that’s exactly how it works)
1 Like
Ok so here’s what I’m getting
- Viewer: Can read but needs confirmation from an admin to apply edits made
- Member: Can make edits without confirmation.
- Admin: Can make edits, confirm edits, and add people to be admin/member.
- Owner (only 1): Can rename and delete the project, and transfer owner to other people.
8 Likes
Cool that’s what I’m thinking
2 Likes
Isn’t that just the current community?
4 Likes
No, the current community consists of remixes. Contributing to a project will add code to someone’s project without remixing, or making it your own. It’s so many people can contribute directly to one thing.
2 Likes
I’m not sure how that would be better than remixes. What benefits would it have over them, other than organization?
4 Likes
Everyone contributing to one project. It’s kinda hard to track down the source of a remix, or combine them all into one project.
3 Likes
bump
1 Like
big bump
Sounds like this would be a good idea to have in hopscotch
4 Likes
yeah! and maybe a third role- viewer- they cannot edit the project officially, but they can add whatever code they want and a notification will be sent to the owners saying they made a suggestion, and showing what they changed, but the code they added will be deleted if the owner doesn’t take it
4 Likes
i feel like now we have undo/redo this could definitely happen, since hopscotch is now keeping track of what was changed so this wouldn’t be too hard to implement (but what do i know), and it would be super helpful - the only thing i would add is that you could publish one project on both accounts and have this:
3 Likes
Ooh and maybe when in the editor show parts that other people edited! But then what about the seed block? Who would get the seeds
2 Likes
well they would add have to be seed devs to collaborate i assume, so theyd be split and in any uneven amount- more would be given to the owner
3 Likes
i don’t see why we’d have to that - everyone collaborated, everyone receive the same reward
3 Likes
i mean, for example, if there were 3 collaborators and they earned 6 seeds from a purchase, theyd all get two but if the same happened with 7 seeds the owner would get three
2 Likes
The extra seed(s) can be put in a leftover stash, and when they get enough seeds to evenly distribute it, then it’ll divide it up.
5 Likes
oh yeah, thats a much better idea
3 Likes
Yeah that is a good idea!
But there is a rule because people who are not seed devs could make a collab with an alt and seed dev or someone who also wants seeds and just add 2 comment blocks or something that does not contribute to anything.
I know that the seed dev would have to accept but that includes using the honour system.
So maybe comment blocks do not count as helping in a collab
3 Likes
